Rules May Be Tightened on Smoking Medical Marijuana

The Canadian government is concerned about the issue of smoking medical marijuana in public.The Canadian government is concerned about the issue of smoking medical marijuana in public.Canadians who have permission from the federal government to smoke marijuana for medicinal purposes are now facing impending restrictions about where they can light up.

Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq said Wednesday in the House of Commons that the government is concerned about the issue of smoking medical marijuana in public.

“That’s why I have instructed my officials to examine this issue and develop options,” said the health minister.

The federal government has been under pressure to clarify the rules around medical marijuana use in public. One recent request for clarification came from a bar owner in Burlington, Ont., who faced allegations of discrimination when he asked a medical marijuana user not to smoke outside his business.

The existing Marijuana Medical Access Regulations, which came into force in 2001, do not stipulate where patients can use their marijuana. While users must abide by any federal or provincial legislation and local bylaws that restrict smoking cigarettes in public places, there are no other specific prohibitions on medical pot use in public.

The government says the issue has been on its radar for some time and that it is responding to public concern in developing the new rules. It has not set a deadline for the new regulations to be in place but the department doesn’t anticipate the process being too lengthy.

Health Canada officials will develop proposed regulations and present them to the health minister, who will make the final decision on the regulations.

A member of the British Columbia Compassion Club Society, a health centre that provides access to medicinal cannabis, says the organization understands the need for clear rules but hopes they are no more strict than the ones imposed on cigarette smokers.

Jayce Sale said however, that they are concerned about the impact of heavier regulations.

“It gets into a slippery slope because medical marijuana users have that right to use it and so by creating more barriers around where they can do it is a concern because it’s limiting options for them,” she said.

Steve Kubby, now a California resident who was a licensed medical marijuana user when he lived in Sechelt, B.C., said he is also concerned about the Canadian government’s decision to take a tougher stand on medical marijuana use.

“We don’t have those kinds of requirements for other people when they use their medicines,” said the 62-year-old who uses cannabis daily to ease the effects of his rare form of cancer.

“It is just so difficult to understand how someone that is struggling with cancer as I am . . . my society would want to send police with guns to terrorize me and my family, tell me where I can and cannot smoke, to arrest me if I happen to be using cannabis in the wrong place or at the wrong time.”

In 2004, Kubby was hiking in a park and confronted by an off-duty RCMP officer who took his joint, threw it on the ground, and told him he had no right to smoke it there even when Kubby explained he was a registered patient under the government’s medical marijuana program.

He sought clarification from Health Canada who told Kubby in a letter soon after the incident that, “While Health Canada advises authorized persons not to consume marijuana in public, there are no legislated restrictions on such action.” The RCMP later apologized to him.

He said people that are using marijuana for medical reasons already have enough to worry about without having to abide by rules about where to use it.

“Patients have such a struggle just to get through each day that all these layers of regulations and laws hurt people, they don’t protect people, they hurt people,” he said.

About 2,800 people are authorized to possess marijuana under the federal government program.

– Article from The Ottawa Citizen.



  1. migraine on

    It’s hard to smoke tobacco in most public places anymore in WA state, except for the casinos.
    While I could smoke cigaretts there, I was asked to extinguish a small cigar. So I can see the argument for marijuana smoking in public. Perhaps extremely unfair if used for medicinal purposes.
    However if it were baked in cookies or brownies and kept on hand for use it could be consumed without much notice. I may be wrong but I’ve never known of some one getting arrested or hassled for eating in public places (except for places where it’s clearly indicated no food or drink, even then if done discreetly it’s usually ignored.)
    So I would personally smoke or vape at home and eat in public if necessary.
    Just mu 2 cents.
    (Opinions are like assholes, Every one has one.)
    Peace to all and continue to fight the good fight.

  2. Zack on

    Well, considering that people don’t allow a joint to sit without burning, there is much less second hand smoke from it simply burning off, and I daresay a humans lungs filter most of it. peace

  3. Dave on

    I don’t think we’ve seen a more hateful group than those harperites. Let’s hope we get them out before he stacks the Senate.

  4. J.G.MacNeil on

    No one can deny that second-hand marijuana smoke is more potent than second-hand tobacco smoke and that it would take a smaller amount of marijuana smoke than tobacco smoke to affect someone in a measurable way. Still, the state that anyone gets in from smoking marijuana all day can in no way be compared to the state that anyone would get in from drinking alcohol all day. So it would seem reasonable that marijuana smokers, (and I make no distinction between medical or normal smokers), should only be required to exercise discretion when smoking in private or semi-public places. When any policy, such as marijuana prohibition, is instituted without regard to “Human Rights” or logical analysis, then there can only be a plethora of unjust “laws” instituted to continually assault the segment of society so targeted. And in such a case, (in which we are definitely now involved), “Justice!” means nothing because the ruling gang, which likes to refer to themselves as the “elite”, makes the laws suit their needs and not the needs of society.