Marijuana Phytotherapy: How to Make Cannabis Whole Plant Resin
You have probably heard of the "major cancer epidemic" going on today, where it is estimated that "one in every two men" and "one in every three women" get cancer in their lifetimes. If not, please see 10:30 of this clip from the film The Corporation. This cancer-rate estimate came before the Fukushima nuclear accident that is currently dumping radiation all over the world.
Perhaps you have heard of cannabis's reputation as a tumor-shrinking medicine? Apparently the US Government knew this back in 1974 and kept it secret.
Have you seen the US patents on cannabis? This is just one of thousands.
There are many videos on YouTube regarding cannabis's tumor-shrinking powers and rapid healing properties. Two of the best are What if Cannabis Cured Cancer and Run From The Cure.
But the latest wave of cancer-related cannabis videos involves the juicing of raw cannabis leaves and buds. This method allows a person to consume much greater amounts of the medicinal ingredients in a juice form than they could if they were just eating raw cannabis leaves or buds (which are hard to swallow and digest due to the scratchy texture).
We all have an Endo-Cannabinoid System (ECS) in our bodies. That system regulates our health and well-being.
When a human being reaches mid-life, the inflammatory arm of the immune system takes on characteristics of an autoimmune disorder for which
the Conditionally Essential Cannabinoid Acids (CECAs) provide unique prophylactic and therapeutic relief.
Cannabinoids effect on diabetes, cancer, autoimmune disorders and ischemic conditions qualify them for recognition as Essential Cannabinoid Acids across the entire life span. Cannabis is a uniquely functional food and if used in its natural state daily, provides more than just nutritional benefits. Smoking does help reduce the symptoms of many conditions but in general it does not work on a curative level like oral consumption does.
One of the benefits of juicing raw cannabis is that, if you manage to avoid heating the cannabis, it isn't psychoactive. This proves cannabis is, at heart, a vegetable, and in it's best form a preventative medicine. Try to consume the juice 3-5 times per day (the metaphor is like a deer grazes). The cannabinoids do their job in the body in about 15 minutes, so supplementing your Endo Cannabinoid System (ECS) all day would be the most ideal treatment program for all sorts of illness and is good for people who want to get rid of their tumors as fast as possible.
If you happen to be a cannabis grower or know a cannabis grower who can provide you with raw plant material, the videos LEAF: The Health Benefits of Juicing Raw Cannabis and The Power of Raw Cannabis may be some use to you.
If you don't grow or know any growers and only have access to the dry cannabis buds, try this recipe for a buds-only treatment.
Suggested treatment for someone with cancer is 6 ounces or more. This recipe is for 3 ounces.
- Grind/crush 3 ounces of well-dried top-quality cannabis buds
- Put cannabis in 20 liters of cold water and stir for 15 minutes
- Pour through a strainer or the largest micron size of bubble bag - don't throw out the buds, stems and leaves yet!
- Let mixture settle 15-30 min. The crystal/trichomes/hash/kief will fall down and settle on the bottom
- Pour/Siphon the water into another pot, leaving the kief mixture behind. Once you pour out most of the water (to about 1/2 inch from the bottom) pour out kief mixture and set aside
- Boil down the water you poured out on mid temperature (7) on the stove burner
- Keep an eye on the water as it reduces and scrape and stir in the oils that form around the sides of the pot.
- Repeat the process with another 20 liters of cold water for a second wash.
- Keep boiling it down to a black, sticky substance - slowly reducing the temp as the water evaporates - don't burn it. (As the mixture thickens add it to the final reduction sauce pan)
- Take the second batch of water and boil it down too. (I use a separate sauce pan to do the final lower temp reduction in.)
- Put the left over cannabis in another pot with water and boil it too, several times. Add the water to the final reduction pan when it becomes thick like a milky tea.
- Now add the kief mixture you had set aside to the black, sticky pot-water reductions, slowly bringing the temperature down. As the water evaporates take it off the heat and put it back on, that helps to not to burn the resin. The end result is something that looks like very sticky black hash.
This cannabis resin is water-soluble and can be added back into water to treat burns and heal wounds and be added to teas.
The normal dose for most people is 1/2 the size of a single grain of rice, 3-5 times per day. Slowly increase your dose when you become used to the medicine by 1/2 rice-size increments until you are taking about a gram a day. If you start to experience an uncomfortable "high" then dial back on the dose untill you have a comfortable platform to move to the next increase in doseage. The point is to be taking as much of this as your body is able to tolerate. You cannot die of overdose, but you might get paranoid and feel like you're going to die if you take too much. Start small and slowly build your way up to a larger dose.
Watch Herb the Herbalist give a LIVE demonstration of cannabis juicing and resin extracting on Pot TV.






Comments
Join us at the 420 workshop
Hi all,
Want to be protected in the medical marijuana field? JOIN US AT OUR SEMINAR JUNE 23 to find out all you need to know to stay safe and legal under California law! From sales taxes on medical marijuana to how to deal with law enforcements; this seminar will guide you into the right direction to be secure and protected in the medical marijuana industry.
Check it out and tell a friend!
www.420workshop.com
oh... where do I send my
oh... where do I send my money.. /scoff
"How do deal with law enforcement"... yeh, don't get caught and "these aren't the droids you're looking for".
I enjoy what you guys are
I enjoy what you guys are usually up too. This kind of clever work and reporting! Keep up the amazing works guys I've you guys to our blogroll.
sell structured settlements
If only
If only mainstream doctors and scientists weren't pawns to lobbyists and big pharma, we could have medical breakthroughs with marijuana and other medicinal herbs all the time. This is truly amazing information here, I know marijuana strains have their beneficial properties when smoked as I list them on my website, http://www.marijuana-strain-spot.com but I wasn't too aware of the benefits of ingesting it. Nice article, thanks
Interesting idea
I see what he's saying. It would produce a chunk of "hash" but with the water soluble components mixed in with the crude ice-hash that the ice-water mixing would leave at the bottom. The boiling down would probably destroy some compounds though. I doubt you'd get much benefit from it but I guess it's possible. Probably just common vegetable components that you could get from boiling pretty much any herb. Personally I would just keep the bubblehash separate in case I wanted to smoke it for quick relief. The fresh Cannabis juice spoken of would be hard to come by. It would take a lot of leaf to get any great amount of juice. Cannabis juice is good in theory but pretty impractical in reality, unless you hooked up with a hemp farm or something.
Yeah and the fresh juice is
Yeah and the fresh juice is taken from premature veg matter that as of yet lacks potent concentrations of the medicinal compounds that we all know and love it for.
Juicing any vegetables though is insanely healthy and known to cure cancer by itself. If anything this just points to our poisonous diets as being a likely cause of a lot of our sickness, which lets face, is more than obvious.
How this proves that getting high is bad and cannabis is not a drug but a vegetable is beyond me.
Anyway it seems to me the gumby hash method would suffice, and no level of boiling is going to change its chemical nature such that it's water soluble.
Things like this will only get used against us. "They think it cures everything... they're obviously a bunch of crazies". Anyone talking sense after that will be completely ignored.
You don't read very carefully, do you?
"Yeah and the fresh juice is taken from premature veg matter..."
Do you see the word "premature" anywhere in the article? I sure don't.
"How this proves that getting high is bad and cannabis is not a drug but a vegetable is beyond me."
The article does not state that getting high is "bad", nor does it state that cannabis is "not a drug". It does state that getting high may not be desired by some people who do not use cannabis regularly ... and something can be a vegetable and a drug at the same time.
"Anyone talking sense after that will be completely ignored."
That's why we included all the links to things like the government admitting cannabis shrunk tumors and the "What if cannabis cured cancer" film with interviews with a bunch of doctors - so that anyone with an open mind could be convinced. Those people with closed minds will never be convinced, so there's no point in trying to reach them anyway.
The Doctor that save my Life with his Hemp/Cannabis Oil
I'm Jennifer Onno from Canada and Thanks to God Almighty for allowing me to try Dr. Henderson Hemp Oil for my lungs cancer, with gratitude to Dr. Henderson i had a miraculous healing and am telling everybody about this great Healing with his Hemp Oil.
I have been on Dr. Henderson Hemp Oil for 4months and i just went to do my Lungs Cancer test and i was told that i have no more cancer.
God am so grateful for all you have done for me concerning my health with the Help of Dr. Henderson and his Hemp Oil service.
If it was not for Dr. Henderson i would be regretting my life now and crying my eyes out.
for all those who have cancer problems please contact Dr. Henderson on via email: hendersonmedicalservice@gmail.com and see to your cancer problems solved.
I am a living witness of Dr. Henderson Hemp Oil Service and i am so grateful to him for saving my life. Doctor Henderson Contact:hendersonmedicalservice@gmail.com
Thank you Dr. Henderson
Warning:
Warning:
There is no Dr. Nathan Kisper, Dr. Mike Henderson, Dr. Smith Williams, Dr. Sedney Carey, Dr. Mac Donnald, Dr. Bryan Vance etc.. Only the big scammers hiding behind these names. Unfortunately I am the one of their victims. Be careful and don't trust them and in any of their "stories"!!!
"Cannabis juice is good in theory but pretty impractical in... "
this would be a completely practical process once prohibition is dealt with fresh leaf, and plant matter would potentially be available from farmers markets, grocery stores etc... at prices that would potentially reflect current veg prices, although this is all idealistic thinking but positive thinking breeds positive results.
I'm Mrs Rachear from USA and
I'm Mrs Rachear from USA and all gratitude from my heart goes to Thanking Doctor Henderson that saved my family linage with his Hemp Oil and the Delta9 that he sold for us. Doctor Henderson, You are the best, as regarding the treatment, my son is now healthy and has started school and he is happy and learning fast with no more cancer in his life. My husband is also now very caring for me all because of your hemp oil.
Doctor Henderson God will never forsake you, you shall be the First and the best in everything you are doing. Thank you for saving my family that had cancer running in our veins, we are healthy now and very happy. Thank you So Much. Thank you So Much Doctor Henderson.
You are a miracle and God sent to Humans. Thank you thank you.
Please contact Dr. Henderson for treatment of cancer and all kinds of diseases at: hendersonmedicalservice@gmail.com
Warning:
Warning:
There is no Dr. Nathan Kisper, Dr. Mike Henderson, Dr. Sedney Carey, Dr. Mac Donnald, Dr. Bryan Vance etc.. Only the big scammers hiding behind these names. Unfortunately I am the one of their victims. Be careful and don't trust them and in any of their "stories"!!!
So it's not "psychoactive",
So it's not "psychoactive", but you might get paranoid and feel like you're about to die. So it's psychoactive then.
Why don't you drop the whole "getting high is bad" schtick and stop thinking you argue from a stronger position if you adopt portions of their factually unsound propaganda. You're ceding ground that needn't be ceded.
Note, the very first "medication" they prescribe to cancer patients are anti depressants to get them high with. Do the math.
You don't read very carefully either.
"So it's not "psychoactive", but you might get paranoid and feel like you're about to die. So it's psychoactive then."
The "not psychoactive" part was in the context of RAW, unheated cannabis juice from fan leaves - no buds. The "feeling like you're about to die" involved heated buds.
"Why don't you drop the whole "getting high is bad" schtick..."
For those words to be in quotes they must be found in the actual article ... and they are not.
What the article actually says is: "If you start to experience an uncomfortable "high" then dial back on the dose untill you have a comfortable platform to move to the next increase in doseage." - This is not a "getting high is bad" message, this is to help people who have never used cannabis in their life - or never eaten it before - to titrate their dose properly.
"Note, the very first "medication" they prescribe to cancer patients are anti depressants to get them high with. Do the math."
Anti-depressants = not depressed.
Cannabis = not depressed and no longer nauseous and hungry and no more cancer.
Levin, your refutations are
Levin, your refutations are nonsense. Consider that maybe you're losing focus of what your objectives ought to be in all of this.
You keep referring to these links as though it validates this information. This is a derivative work based on those links. It's circular logic.
Are those sources credible? Are they scientifically sound, proven, reviewed, published in any scientific or medically renowned journal? No to all of the above. Oh it's a "youtube" video, from a "Doctor", give me an fn break. Maybe this bs works for your circles buddy, lots of pats on the back and circle jerks, but there are people with brains with an eye on this and ... you're really making their day, giving them all the ammo in the world to use against you.
Now you're going to argue "well why don't you present something better that proves my point then, and if you can't then this garbage source and information HAS to be accepted". But alas, it's not my burden to prove your miracle is true, sir, and an argument from ignorance is no proof at all; "we can't prove god doesn't exist and so... see you in church on sunday". Is that your best... really? One trick pony?
"Do you see the word "premature" anywhere in the article? I sure don't."
I would refer to your own sources. Apparently you're not fully versed on the subject matter. They juice premature leaves only, and why not because THC is bad right.... don't want that nasty non medicinal feel good high.... oo nasty. May as well be hemp, because getting high is bad, getting high is unnatural... getting high is a human perversion... the deer don't heat it... only hunter gathers have adulterated it with heat which is purely a human invention... it never sits out in the fields curing in the sun.. surely the wise doctor would have known.... we must use it in its natural state, virgin non medicinal leaf juice.
Oh look at that.. genius "doctor" discovers the medical value of a plant in a way it's not generally considered at all useful or used that completely invalidates all the ways it has been known as a medicine that aren't "politically correct". Apparently we lost that war, it had no legitimacy and so now is the time to adapt to adapt and adopt the absurd. Isn't that convenient. Buy his book!
"The article does not state that getting high is "bad", nor does it state that cannabis is "not a drug". It does state that getting high may not be desired by some people who do not use cannabis regularly ... and something can be a vegetable and a drug at the same time."
It completely implies it to any reasonable person. Again, refer to your own source material where it's a repeated theme every few seconds. The entirety of those videos essentially consists of repeating that notion endlessly.
You've obviously taken on the position of the absurd in your defense of it. If a vegetable could get you high it would in fact be classified as a drug rather than a vegetable. Or perhaps you can name a single vegetable on the market that gets you high? Didn't think so. Magic Mushrooms aren't sold in grocery stores for a reason. Quite foolish indeed to fathom this should be the argument that legalizes it.
"For those words to be in quotes they must be found in the actual article ... and they are not."
You seem to not understand the basic usage of quotation marks. Suggest you research it.
"What the article actually says is: "If you start to experience an uncomfortable "high" then dial back on the dose untill you have a comfortable platform to move to the next increase in doseage." - This is not a "getting high is bad" message, this is to help people who have never used cannabis in their life - or never eaten it before - to titrate their dose properly. "
Flat out BS David, and you know it. That's a strawman as you've taken it out of context. It's saying it doesn't get you high David, and then it's saying if you get too high, take less. David, if it doesn't get you high, why would you have to take less from getting too high.
"Anti-depressants = not depressed."
Is that a fact? You should just see the look on my face.. aren't you smarter than that, more informed than that? At least a little? Come on Levin, give it up.
Stick to the damn facts that actually have credibly sound information backing them and ignore this low hanging poisoned fruit snake oil bait nonsense that completely discredits the entire medical marijuana cause. You're making fools of us all, and I say that in the nicest way possible. There is no cause whatsoever to cede the high ground of being factually correct and adopting this damaging snake oil drivel, as nice and even maybe as sincere as those involved may be.
You're as careful with spelling as you are with logic
"Levin, your refutations are nonsense."
My name is Malmo-LevinE.
"You keep referring to these links as though it validates this information. This is a derivative work based on those links. It's circular logic."
Hmmm ... the links involve interviews with doctors and published, peer-reviewed studies ... should I believe them, or an anonymous critic who doesn't back up what he says with any links or citations to anything? ... hmmmm.
"Are those sources credible? Are they scientifically sound, proven, reviewed, published in any scientific or medically renowned journal?"
From an article a friend of mine and I are working on:
"Evidence demonstrating the cancer fighting properties of the cannabinoids comes from multiple arenas of scientific investigation, including multiple animal and preclinical studies. Unfortunately, due to the politics, power struggles, and obstructive government and corporate interventions associated with the prohibition laws concerning cannabis, there are to date only a few human case and/or pilot studies corroborating the cancer fighting properties of cannabis and the cannabinoids (Armentano, 2006b; Holland, 2010; more here). Despite the obstacles described above, however, over the last decade or so, a clear picture has emerged. Multiple animal and preclinical studies, as well as a few case and/or pilot studies strongly suggest that cannabinoids are cancer fighting agents for a wide range of cancers, including breast carcinoma (Cafferal et al., 2010; Cafferal, Sarrió, Palacios, Guzmán, & Sánchez, 2006; De Petrocellis et al., 1998; Ligresti et al., 2006; McAllister, Christian, Horowitz, Garcia, & Desprez, 2007), prostate cancer (Mimeault, Pommery, Wattez, Bailly, & Hénichart, 2003; Ruiz, Miguel, & Diaz-Laviada, 1999; Sarfaraz, Afaq, Adhami, & Muhktar, 2005), pancreatic adenocarcinoma (Carracedo et al., 2006; Michalski et al., 2008), colorectal carcinoma (Patsos et al., 2005), skin carcinoma (Casanova et al., 2003), neuroblastoma (Guzmán, 2003), lung carcinoma (Guzmán, 2003; Preet, Ganju, & Groopman, 2008), uterus carcinoma (Guzmán, 2003), oral cancer (Whyte et al., 2010), cervical carcinoma (Ramer & Hinz, 2008), lymphoma (Gustafsson, Christensson, Sander, & Flygare, 2006; Gustafsson et al., 2008), gliomas (Blázquez et al., 2003; Blázquez et al., 2004; Galve-Roperh et al., 2000; Guzmán et al., 2006; Massi et al., 2004; Sánchez, Galve-Roperh, Canova, Brachet, & Guzmán, 1998), leukemia cells (Jia et al., 2006; Powles et al., 2005), and biliary tract cancers (Leelawat, Leelawat, Narong, & Matangkasombut, 2010). In fact, the evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates that the cannabinoids have anticancer properties, with hundreds of peer-reviewed studies to date demonstrating these effects (see http://www.cannabisscience.com/ for a list of over 800 peer-reviewed cannabis and cancer references)."
See also:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16908594
http://americanmarijuana.org/Guzman-Cancer.pdf
That's just what I could find in two minutes ... you critique those and if necessary I'll come up with a dozen more that you can also try and dismiss ... so far you've come up with squat to support your "it's all bunk" theory. Where are YOUR peer-reviewed studies critiquing any of the stuff in the article and/or any of the studies above?
"They juice premature leaves only, and why not because THC is bad right...."
No. As I explained before, 1) some people don't want to be high at all, and 2) you can get way more of the other constituents inside you if you don't also have to worry about how high you're going to get.
"If a vegetable could get you high it would in fact be classified as a drug rather than a vegetable."
Chocolate gets you high and it's classified as a food:
http://www.cookingwithcolor.com/chocolate/choc_drugs.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_effects_of_chocolate#Stimulant
"It's saying it doesn't get you high David, and then it's saying if you get too high, take less."
Wrong. The part about it not getting you high was the juicing raw fan leaves part ... the part about dose titration was about heated buds. I triple-dog dare you to quote the part about it not getting you high - in context - and show me where it's talking about heated buds.
"Stick to the damn facts that actually have credibly sound information backing them and ignore this low hanging poisoned fruit snake oil bait nonsense that completely discredits the entire medical marijuana cause."
For someone who is unable to muster a single citation to back up what they say you certainly have a fact fetish. Lead by example, oh wise and knowledgeable anonymous critic.
I'm not critiquing valid
I'm not critiquing valid research that weed may be effective in fighting some cancers. That would be taking your bait. It simply isn't at all the argument at hand. That you'd present unrelated evidence in support of your article reeks of far fetched desperation and simply isn't the tactic of people arguing from a perspective of having factual truth on their side.
Aside from that, not all cancers are the same and you would do well to note that these sensational snake oil articles don't recognize that fact, including your laughable snake oil sources that DO relate to it, which are the only ones you're justified in referencing. EX: "Run from _THE_ cure" vs "Run from _a_ potential cure/benefit". A subtle difference with a drastically different meaning.
You're hyper extending valid conclusions that were based on supporting evidence in those credible works, to the very absurd, which are not at all supported by them and only loosely related, in your attempt to validate the non credible.
This isn't the scientific method, but the snake oil method, and you're playing an active roll in it right now. Doctors doing this, specifically those you've reference, should be charged for malpractice, but they're doing such a fine job in baiting and discrediting the likes of you and the medical movement constituents who adopt it unthinkingly, that they're such useful tools in that respect, they'll only be allowed to continue.
Ultimately we've learned through painful experience not to trust doctors implicitly because it's only their white lab coats that create representatives of a faith based institution of false authority.
But all it takes to forget this apparently, is one or two opportunistic quacks, telling us just what we want to hear.
You lend them the weight of your magazine to their snake oil malpractice, and now Tommy Chong will die, because he believed in you david... he believed. CNN will have a field day: "Looks like he (sunglasses)... ran from the cure".
Consider that there is in fact such a thing as a trojan horse, as much as there is in having enough rope to hang yourself with.
When those unrelated, valid studies you now reference mention cannabinoids, they _include_ the psychoactive ones that get you "high", just like the happy pills do that are the fashionable first prescriptions for cancer patients.
More to the point, do they exclude any, or draw conclusions pertaining to their isolation or their complex interactions? No, and your theories are not validated by them.
By the use of logic similar to your own, Karla Homolka should be crowned a Saint, because Mother Theresa; oh look a butterfly. It's irrelevant and false equivalence.
"Chocolate gets you high and it's classified as a food"
Yet, not classified as a psychoactive vegetable.
"No. As I explained before, 1) some people don't want to be high at all, and 2) you can get way more of the other constituents inside you if you don't also have to worry about how high you're going to get."
What if some people don't like their vegetables, can they get high then? Where is your science proving that? Ooh right.. in your world it's my burden of proof to disprove it.
First, you need to acknowledge the information in your only legitimate source, which constantly denounces getting high as being some human derived unnatural mutation and that we should use it as a vegetable for maximum healing benefit, which is of course absolutely bogus. You can't validate that by saying "some people prefer"..... to damn bad.
On Jeremiah's recent show he had a doctor do a phone interview that dismissed it entirely. "All of the good medicinal cannibanoids will just stick to the side of the juicer while you'll be extracting more of the bad/harmful stuff that we don't want".
Herbman than defended by saying "nobody actually knows anything about it", which is again the argument by ignorance, but at least he didn't resort to your tactic and offer to post a sea of irrelevance in support of some parallel argument that wasn't happening.
Although what the doctor didn't know was that not much will stick to the side, because if you look at your own sources in the videos, they only harvest fetal veg matter. There's nothing much to stick before it ever gets sticky. The part that does stick is the part about getting a concentration of bad stuff from it with very little that's actually medicinal in terms of cannabinoids.
At this point the live enzymes, vitamins and minerals that you might get from juicing even typical vegetables, have all been known to "cure cancer" by themselves. This, however, fails to equate bong hits with pizza, which is a vegetable.
This is clearly the kind of fallacy of inference you risk with a lack of objectivity.
That said, some people may not want to be high at all, okay. The answer to that is that this drug may not be for some people.
Perhaps they'd greatly prefer the pharmaceutical brain crack happy pills that "don't get them high *WINK*, and that only leave them drowning in puddles of their drool, trembling uncontrollably and having lost their vocabulary.
Oddly enough, the wants and desires of these people quickly fade into nothing once they've started their prescriptions, you know, because they're so lobotomized by them. Do you understand how we hold the high ground be default, until you resort to snake oil? I hope you're starting to get it.
All you're doing is lending weight to the bogus argument that being "high" is bad and that we really need options. What do you think the ultimate result of that stupidity is going to be?
Of course your answer does nothing at all to address the point in question, which is that they do take premature veg matter only for juicing. You must have thought your opinion trumps the facts.
If it's simply a matter of not applying heat, then why not let the plant mature and ensure it is concentrated with cannabinoids, or has any worth a mention at all?
If it's a vegetable and we don't want those psychoactive cannabinoids, why not simply juice some other, already legal vegetable. Why do we need another vegetable David.. there are so many already.
You do realize that the juicing process adds heat as well? In fact vegetable juice is considered partially cooked on that basis.
They have to use premature veg matter, because it's the only way they can feed the juicer frequently enough. You might imagine this bogus theory would do wonders for growers in terms of their their throughput and turn around time ..If only they could devise a method that would do away with having to wait for the buds to ripen..even do away with the high-lighting requirements and ferts.. the need of a quality end product. Nooooooo they wouldn't do that, would they David?
I strongly suggest that you torrent a documentary called fat sick and nearly dead. In that you'll discover the curative ability of juicing vegetables and making smart decisions. Then you can ask yourself what science proves cannabis that's juiced is any more beneficial than any other juiced vegetable and ask yourself why we need it again?
Start thinking more david, and don't be so quick to support con artists who are only telling you exactly what you want to hear. You'll only help them dig a hole for us all.
As per your personal pre-occupation with my anonymity, it wouldn't help your pathetic arguments if you found out I was david suziki or a country western star, but you should have more respect for a mother of 16. Shame on you.
Wow ... you should publish.
You know so much about cannabis medicine! You shouldn't leave it in the comment section of an article that is no longer on the home page ... you should write an article yourself! Share your wisdom with the world!
Perhaps you could even put your name to it! Then you could stake your own reputation on it - if it turns out to be true, people could ask you questions and learn more. If it turns out to be false, your attacktivist days of taking pot shots at pot activists from the shadows would be over.
Somehow I suspect you will continue your nonsensical rants from the safety of anonymity. Most of my critics are anonymous, for obvious reasons.
I read through your last response and there wasn't one sentence of it that I could agree with, and quite a few that were just silly. Maybe if you ever find the courage to write an article and put your name to it I could take the time to critique it properly ... but as of right now I think I'll let "Mama Suziki's" arguments stand unchallenged and check back here periodically to see if anyone with a real name agreed with you and attached their reputation to yours.
Trolls don't have names, just
Trolls don't have names, just anonymity. lol.
anon
Thank you Anonymous for your straight-forward, no-nonsense, rebuttal. You are correct how this kind of info. is counterproductive and feeding into ignorance is bliss.
Great counter-points. Thanks very much.
Perücken
Perücken
Just wanted to let you know
Just wanted to let you know that you are 100% correct here, anon. OP is insinuating that cannabis resin is water soluble, which is blantantly ignorant of basic chemistry (and hash making for that matter).
These types aren't much interested in the facts, any documentary that says something vaguely consistent with their prior beliefs becomes "evidence".
This resin has now been
This resin has now been tested both in the field and by Scientists. It is a perfect complimentary therapy to all Cannabis extracts/concentrates. The science is out now. This method follows the same methodology as the federal patents.
Trichomes are more dense than water and get suspended in the solution not soluble at all, that's the point here...
There are however flavinoids and terpenes that are water soluble. Those flavinoids and terpenes have a synergistic effect with the decarbolxolated trichomes. Almost immediately after consuming the resin it's almost as if your insides start to vibrate.
If after making the "HRO" Herb Resin Oil, you can test it by bleeding out oils with either alcohol or some appropriate solvent.
So this is simply an ORGANIC solvent free alternative Cannabis PHYTOTHERAPY. Topically this preforms miracles!!!
The medicine works.
Herb.
These types aren't much
These types aren't much interested in the facts, any documentary that says something vaguely consistent with their prior beliefs becomes "evidence"
rayban RB4098
Alternative Cannabinoid Dietary Cannabis
Dietary Cannabis Juicing, Sprouting and Non-psychoactive Cannabinoid Dosing info from Dr. William Courtney at www.RawHemp.tk
autoflower resin
I like the idea of letting everyone make their own medicine, and autoflowering cannabis can give this opportunity to everyone!
http://www.autoflowering-cannabis.com/
Juliet: Have you been
Juliet: Have you been searching for high quality Hemp oil? Search no more. Dr. Thomas Hemp Oil is available for purchase within all regions in the United State of America and to be delivered by U.P.S delivery agent and the Natural potency of the THC content in his Hemp oil which is a hundred percent guarantee in curing all cancerous diseases is amazing: check this treatment out yourself by contacting Dr.Thomas on Email: thomasmedicalservice@gmail.com, Once you purchase your high grade hemp oil from Dr. Thomas, you should look forward to U.P.S.delivery agent ASAP.
This information is to be pass one to all United States of America Citizens, both North America and South America.
Warning: There is no Dr.
Warning:
There is no Dr. Nathan Kisper, Dr. Mike Henderson, Dr. Steve Philip, Dr. Smith Williams, Dr. Sedney Carey, Dr. Mac Donnald, Dr. Bryan Vance, Dr. Robert Melamede, Dr. Thomas, Dr. Burton etc.. Only the big scammers hiding behind these names. Be careful and don't trust them and in any of their "stories"!!!
Hello Anna ! As a child, in
Hello Anna !
As a child, in the 40's & 50's... I was given an embroidery set from each of my Aunts, maybe a tray cloth or chair back covers . I loved making these into things of beauty, and giving them back as Birthday presents for them ..they loved them ! and I loved making them.
I love this set , Anna !
LoveMarg