"why not vote for someone who is willing to admit that it needs to be legalized. Rather than voting for someone who doesn't have "legalize" in their vocabulary."- because all you'll end up doing is splitting the liberal vote allowing the republicans (who usually nominate a conservative)back into office. Then where will we be? With luck, Bush lite, worst case, Bush on steroids.
Submitted by Anonymous () on Tue, 10/20/2009 - 04:01.
here's why
"why not vote for someone who is willing to admit that it needs to be legalized. Rather than voting for someone who doesn't have "legalize" in their vocabulary."- because all you'll end up doing is splitting the liberal vote allowing the republicans (who usually nominate a conservative)back into office. Then where will we be? With luck, Bush lite, worst case, Bush on steroids.