The whole case is completly based on pressuring political activists and trying to silence their voice/monetary contributions to the movement. The DEA letter typed up on the behalf of the raid clearly states it as a majot "blow" to activists who will have "one less" source of funds to rely on. How can that letter in itself not get the case thrown???

Submitted by Anonymous () on Tue, 05/26/2009 - 00:20.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <span> <img> <b> <i> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.