Colorado Reps Seek State Exemption From Federal Pot Prohibition Laws

In the wake of this week’s historic vote to legalize marijuana in Colorado, the state’s three Democratic U.S. House members are drafting legislation aimed at easing the tension between the new state law and longstanding federal prohibition of the drug.

Congressional staffers told the Independent that Colorado Reps Diana DeGette (CD1), Ed Perlmutter (CD7) and Jared Polis (CD2) are working independently and together on bills that would exempt states where pot has been legalized from the Controlled Substances Act.

DeGette Chief of Staff Lisa Cohen told the Independent that proposals the representatives are working on would alter section 903 of the act to allow states to establish their own marijuana laws free from federal preemption.

Colorado’s Amendment 64 passed by a wide margin on Election Day. It legalizes adult use and possession here and would establish retail marijuana sales.

The state legalized medical marijuana years ago and the industry has boomed in recent years.

– Read the entire article at The Colorado Independent.



  1. Pingback: buy kona

  2. Pingback: Morgan dollar

  3. Pingback: best kona

  4. Pingback: home improvement up your alley

  5. Pingback: fashion-toy-store ebay

  6. Pingback: maxi dresses zulily

  7. Pingback: 黃金彩虹dvd

  8. Pingback: c a dresses 2015

  9. Pingback: ladies fashion games

  10. Pingback: سرور مجاری فرانسه

  11. Pingback: Cheap Carolina Panthers Jerseys

  12. Pingback: Buy beats online

  13. Pingback: brand colors

  14. Pingback: fashion week el paso

  15. Pingback: legit email processing jobs

  16. Pingback: allegra d appetite suppressant

  17. Pingback: fashion world branches

  18. Pingback: 4 fashions livingston nj

  19. Pingback: air canada traveling in canada

  20. Pingback: travel and leisure 50 places to visit in 2016

  21. Pingback: bhutan asia

  22. Pingback: Site sparkfun: Invalid

  23. Pingback: dr kat

  24. Pingback: safe traveling tips europe

  25. Pingback: 福井脱毛

  26. Pingback: China Import Agent

  27. Pingback: 福井脱毛

  28. Pingback: 福井脱毛

  29. Pingback: business travel vs personal travel

  30. Pingback: 福井脱毛

  31. Pingback: 福井脱毛

  32. Pingback: traveling essay

  33. Pingback: eat sleep travel shirt

  34. Pingback: games for pc download

  35. Pingback: travel guide salary

  36. Pingback: x backpackers world travel brisbane

  37. Pingback: full apps pc download

  38. Pingback: their explanation

  39. Pingback: aquarium filter material

  40. Pingback: 韓国エスコートアガシ

  41. Pingback: Arduino shields

  42. Pingback: Phentermine Dispensary

  43. Pingback: Cheap Movie Baseball Jerseys

  44. Pingback: Neapolitan pizza

  45. Pingback: adam and eve

  46. Pingback: recover files from sd card

  47. Pingback: erotic talk

  48. Pingback: Buy Phentermine Without Prescription

  49. Pingback: best glass dildo

  50. Pingback: sex toys

  51. Pingback: swan wand

  52. Pingback: destiny

  53. Pingback: best g spot vibrator

  54. Pingback: silicone vibrator

  55. Pingback: g spot vibrator

  56. Pingback: top smm panel

  57. Pingback: 2B0-015 Certification Exam Questions and Answers

  58. Pingback: clasificado online usa

  59. Pingback: persian setar

  60. Pingback: Wireless headset microphone systems

  61. Pingback: camere spion

  62. Pingback: buy youtube views cheap

  63. Pingback: amazon Customer Reviews

  64. Pingback: Search 3000 App

  65. Pingback: forex signal list pro

  66. Pingback: Google

  67. moldy on

    One thing to think about is that now the state(s) will be running the “shops” with state employees and keep in mind that this is their OWN state’s revenue stream. That is quite a bit different than playing wack-o-moe with dispensaries that are privately owned. A 55% margin is a lot of political capital for the people of those two states. I don’t think I’d want to be the guy that orders the goons in and we know that would be Obama even though we know he’ll pretend not to know about it.

  68. animan425 on

    Apparently what has happened in CA was the DEA waved the prospect of all that easy money for the taking in the faces of the local cops and they went for it, violating their own state laws (passed by popular vote) with the excuse that they were being forced to support federal laws. This was just a B-S excuse for helping the DEA steal all those cannabis shop profits because it was the easiest theft (perfect crime?) ever.

    After all, they’re the law and they wear uniforms, and they knew how easy it was to move in and just take over any old cannabis shop they felt like whenever. None of the owners and operators ever wanted any trouble and never put up any kind of defensive fight.

    If CO and WA want to avoid similar treatment by the DEA, they should find a way to pay the local cops to NOT support the DEA. Maybe some kind of special tax on cannabis that would go directly to the police, I dunno. Because if something like that isn’t done, the DEA will wave all that easy money in the cops faces and start spouting “federal” justifications for theft and ignoring state laws.