California Supreme Court Decision Allows Localities to Regulate Medical Marijuana Dispensaries

Yesterday, the California Supreme Court dismissed the case of Pack v. City of Long Beach. The Pack case addresses the issue of whether local regulations governing medical marijuana production and distribution are preempted by the federal law Controlled Substances Act.

The Supreme Court decision to dismiss this case means that localities can move forward enacting and implementing regulatory programs as they have been for many years.

The Court found that since Long Beach had since repealed the ordinance that was the focus of the lower court’s decision that the legal validity of the ordinance was moot and dismissed the case.

The original decision in the Pack case came from an appellate court in October of last year, which held that some medical marijuana dispensary regulations may be preempted by federal law. The case was appealed and a decision was made last January to vacate the lower court’s decision and review the ruling. The lower court’s decision in Pack concerned many localities in California that have enacted or wish to enact programs to regulate medical marijuana within their communities, some of which used it as a justification to ban dispensaries all together.

“The recent crackdown by the U.S. Attorneys in California has left medical marijuana businesses looking to state and local officials to carve a path of regulation in order to preserve safe access to medical marijuana in California. This decision allows them to move forward,” said Tamar Todd, senior staff attorney for the Drug Policy Alliance. “There is now no legal impediment for state and local government in California to move forward with responsible regulation for medical marijuana cultivation and distribution to patients. The question now is whether it is regulated or whether it operates on the margins.”

The Supreme Court is still poised to decide Riverside v. Inland Empire Patient’s Health and Wellness Center. The Riverside case addresses the issue of whether localities have a right under state law to ban all dispensaries.

– Article originally from Drug Policy Alliance.

Comments

3 Comments

  1. Anonymous on

    jimmy tabas and voula divetta are brother and sister, these two rejects are with california and colombia, “C” states, A “C” state are all about police and evil, change your first letters colombia and california if you want respect, “Cs” are pussies, a good cop is a dead cop. jews are terrorists. jimmy tabas and voula divetta are mersonaries, danny g is the someone, voula and jimmy are vlahee gypsy bloodlines and hitler did kil 2 million of voula and jimmys and 4 million of speilberg and seinfeld, hitler was a genius but today there is technologies injected inside all humans so nothing is a secret because of drugs and sex that people squil on eah other and really its the jews playing with weak uneducated people for fun and gamesand everyone suffers and dies. well you all know its the jews and what ae u all going to do about it? il bet nothing, all you humans on this earth to this point are all cowardly jews anyway. FUCK OFF HARPER I WANT YOUR FAMILY DEAD, YOUR ONLY A FILL IN POLITITION ELECTED BY JEWS, IM IN FOREVER BEAUSE I TRIED TO KILL OFF A VLAHOO IN PUBLIC BUT THE JEWS SWUTCHED MY GUNS FROM A SEMI AUTO TO A SINGLE ACTION.

  2. Anonymous on

    california is the imbred state with no education, i will pay 25 dollars for the killings of any jew on earth…