Drug Money Saved Banks in Global Crisis, Claims UN Advisor

Drugs money worth billions of dollars kept the financial system afloat at the height of the global crisis, the United Nations’ drugs and crime tsar has told the Observer.

Antonio Maria Costa, head of the UN Office on Drugs and Crime, said he has seen evidence that the proceeds of organised crime were “the only liquid investment capital” available to some banks on the brink of collapse last year. He said that a majority of the $352bn (£216bn) of drugs profits was absorbed into the economic system as a result.

This will raise questions about crime’s influence on the economic system at times of crisis. It will also prompt further examination of the banking sector as world leaders, including Barack Obama and Gordon Brown, call for new International Monetary Fund regulations. Speaking from his office in Vienna, Costa said evidence that illegal money was being absorbed into the financial system was first drawn to his attention by intelligence agencies and prosecutors around 18 months ago. “In many instances, the money from drugs was the only liquid investment capital. In the second half of 2008, liquidity was the banking system’s main problem and hence liquid capital became an important factor,” he said.

Some of the evidence put before his office indicated that gang money was used to save some banks from collapse when lending seized up, he said.

“Inter-bank loans were funded by money that originated from the drugs trade and other illegal activities… There were signs that some banks were rescued that way.” Costa declined to identify countries or banks that may have received any drugs money, saying that would be inappropriate because his office is supposed to address the problem, not apportion blame. But he said the money is now a part of the official system and had been effectively laundered.

“That was the moment [last year]when the system was basically paralysed because of the unwillingness of banks to lend money to one another. The progressive liquidisation to the system and the progressive improvement by some banks of their share values [has meant that]the problem [of illegal money]has become much less serious than it was,” he said.

The IMF estimated that large US and European banks lost more than $1tn on toxic assets and from bad loans from January 2007 to September 2009 and more than 200 mortgage lenders went bankrupt. Many major institutions either failed, were acquired under duress, or were subject to government takeover.

Gangs are now believed to make most of their profits from the drugs trade and are estimated to be worth £352bn, the UN says. They have traditionally kept proceeds in cash or moved it offshore to hide it from the authorities. It is understood that evidence that drug money has flowed into banks came from officials in Britain, Switzerland, Italy and the US.

British bankers would want to see any evidence that Costa has to back his claims. A British Bankers’ Association spokesman said: “We have not been party to any regulatory dialogue that would support a theory of this kind. There was clearly a lack of liquidity in the system and to a large degree this was filled by the intervention of central banks.”

– Article from Guardian.

Comments

3 Comments

  1. George Lenard on

    It is reported the dramatic increases in the amount of heroin flowing out Afghanistan that reached record proportions coincided with the Bush Administration convincing the UN of the necessity to seek the Master Mind of the World Trade Center Attacks, and oust the Taliban control for its harboring of Osama bin Ladin? The same bin Ladin that who to date, 8 years later has still not been found. Again, coincidentally the flow of heroin out of Afghanistan becomes just a trickle when the Bush Administration leaves office in January of 08. So did the drug money save the backs? If you buy $10,000 dollars or more of publicly traded stock through normal channels the origin of the funds is not questioned? So was it drug money of organized crime that saved the banks? Assuming government is not considered to be members of organized crime?

  2. Covey69 on

    Enough is Enough

    We need Direct Democracy where all the PEOPLE hold all the POWER!!

    Lets end their tyranny of corruption through commerce, lets all have the power to choose our own laws.

    They want to put Nuclear Plants in Alberta and even though most hate the idea, they twist numbers and make it sound better then sliced bread.

    I WILL NOT ALLOW THIS!!!

    WE NEED To Voice Together all of us including the Non-smokers.

    They buy our elected and control them like puppets.

    DIRECT DEMOCRACY

    PURE DEMOCRACY!!!

  3. Anonymous on

    this is not gang money this is money governments make by smuggling and aiding in illegal drug trade