British Government Ignores Scientific Advice and Reclassifies Cannabis

The British government’s decision to ignore scientific advice has been controversialCannabis has been reclassified in England and Wales by the government from a Class C to a Class B drug, carrying a higher maximum jail sentence for possession.

Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said there was “uncertainty at the least” on the future impact on young people’s mental health as a result of using cannabis.

Therefore she was going to take “err on the side of caution and protect the public” by upping the classification level, she went on.

Cannabis users in the UK tend to smoke the drug in “joints” although it can also be eaten in “hash cakes” or drunk (the active ingredient is soluble in milk) in “hash coffee”.

The drug, derived from the flower buds of the cannabis sativa plant, grows indigenously in Asia and has been used as an intoxicant since Assyrian times.

In modern times, it is usually produced in herbal form (“grass” or “weed”) or as a resin (“dope”).

Its use in Britain was very limited until the 1950s, when it was brought to the country in slightly larger quantities by West Indian immigrants.

The plant had been introduced to the new world by plantation workers from the Indian subcontinent.
The hippy sub-culture of the mid to late 60s spread the drug’s use.

Cannabis has been illegal in Britain since 1928, when a law derived from the International Convention on Narcotics Control came into effect.

The convention was mainly concerned with controlling the Far East’s opium problem, but cannabis was also included by the League of Nations in its list of substances which member states should seek to control, at the behest of Egyptian and Turkish delegates.

The law was applied in a rather erratic manner throughout the UK until the Misuse of Drugs Act in 1971, which introduced the drug classification system and sentencing guidelines.

In 2004, the then Home Secretary David Blunkett approved the reclassification of cannabis from Class B (which it had been since the 1971 act) to Class C.

The move followed a report from the Home Affairs Select Committee and advice from an independent panel of experts – the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD).

Mr Blunkett said he hoped the move would free the police to concentrate on more “serious drugs”. Advice to forces in England and Wales said possession of the drug in small quantities would normally be dealt with by an informal warning or caution.

In May 2008, however, the current Home Secretary Jacqui Smith announced that she would reverse the 2004 decision and put cannabis back into category B.

The move went against the ACMD’s latest recommendations, but was, she said, necessary because of research linking heavy use of the drug with schizophrenia and other mental illnesses.

Ms Smith said she was particularly concerned over the rise in consumption of super-strength strains of cannabis, such as “skunk”. The Home Office say such strains account for 80% of all cannabis seizures in the UK.

There are plans to introduce a “three strikes” system for cannabis possession, where a warning will be followed by an £80 spot fine (called a “penalty notice of disorder”) and a third offence will render a person liable to arrest and prosecution.

The spot fine proposal, as part of a list of 21 more offences for which police could impose penalties, is due for further consultation after magistrates expressed concerns about taking offences away from the courts system.
But the government says it wants spot fines for cannabis possession “as soon as possible”.

The BBC News website and Radio One’s Newsbeat have been talking to people concerned with the reclassification:

Professor David Nutt, Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs

“Some individuals do get unpleasant mental reactions but they are relatively small in number.

“We are not convinced that moving it to Class B with the possibility of five years’ imprisonment for possession will have any beneficial effects.

“There are potential risks of criminalising people who are using a drug which doesn’t harm other people, only themselves.

“Alcohol is more harmful [than cannabis]– to the population, certainly, and to the individual, possibly.”

Marjorie Wallace, mental health charity Sane

“We support the proposal to reclassify it as a Class B drug.

“Cannabis, especially in its more toxic varieties, can double the chance of developing severe mental illness in a significant minority of people, particularly the young, whose brains are still developing.

“While we do not yet know the cause of psychotic illness, or the ways in which drugs such as cannabis may trigger breakdown, relapse, and worsen outcomes, we need to maintain a clear message that it is dangerous to the 10-20% of people who may be at risk but do not know it.”

Danny Kushlick, drugs policy think tank Transform

“Nobody is going to be put off smoking cannabis by the decision to reclassify it.

“It’s a decision that has been taken for political reasons, to trump the Tories’ law and order agenda, rather than for any scientific reason.

“Our position is – if cannabis can be dangerous to a few, yet two million people regularly smoke it – we should have a regulated and supervised market for it, rather than putting its distribution in the hands of criminals.”

Det Ch Supt Andy West, Lincolnshire Police

Det Ch Supt West was in charge of the investigation into the murder of Stevie Barton, a student who was killed by paranoid cannabis user Marc Middlebrook in 2007.

“[Reclassification] will send out a message.

“People are far more prone now to take cannabis, alcohol and other substances and get completely paralytic drunk and bombed out of their minds.

“It’s not right. We’ve all got to take some responsibility for our actions. That decision [to downgrade cannabis in 2004], in my mind, made it a lot easier for people to excuse their own bad behaviour.”

Martin Barnes, independent drug charity DrugScope

“We remain concerned that the government rejected independent expert advice on cannabis classification – a worrying precedent has been set.

“There is no evidence that moving the drug to Class B will of itself reduce levels of use, harm or availability nor is there evidence that the public wants to see tougher penalties for cannabis possession, particularly for young people.

“Cannabis is a harmful drug and we do need to be vigilant. Using the classification system to ‘send out a message’ is a blunt and questionable approach, particularly if it risks undermining… credibility.”

Statement from the Magistrates’ Association

“The singling-out of possession of cannabis for disposal through a PND [penalty notice of disorder]sets it aside from the other Class B drugs and sends an unacceptable signal to those who use it.

“The significant campaign by the Magistrates’ Association and other agencies to reclassify the drug will be undermined if this is implemented.”

Bob, cannabis user

Bob is a 45-year-old IT worker who lives in a town on the Kent coast and has been using cannabis for 26 years. He says he smokes “five to 25” joints a day.

“What I’d like to ask politicians is what harm am I doing by staying in, rolling a few spliffs [joints]and watching television?

“Maybe I should be out down the pub, getting pissed, getting in punch-ups and shouting my head off? That seems the establishment’s preferred option.

“The only harm I do is to my own lungs. The fact that I’m considered a criminal is, I think, a fundamental breach of my human rights.”

– Article from BBC News.

Comments

6 Comments

  1. Sir Les on

    I will agree that it should be studied more by people who are not working for the almighty dollar/funding…for these kinds of studies usually are controlled by the one paying for the studies.

    Now if we look at all the aspects of Hemp and Marijuana…utilizing the balance in fare play…the positives outweigh the negitives!

    Gloabl warming (co2 emmissions build up) the solution.. Marijuana and hemp (co2 emission consumption) utilizing hydroponics and light from the sun…safe..efficiant…eco friendly in filtering the water, to cleaning the soils, and it also produces more…Food from seeds for the birds and other animals that eat of it, making them and their immune systems strong helps reduce the chance of sickness arising or spreading…textiles…and drugs…
    It could even power space flight, and colinization of planets over time…

    So Yes to study this plant would bring a new face on the planet…if we only remove the Idiots from their thrones…and bring em down to earth…

    Humankind has to break free from the hypocrisy of democracy, and move to a Edenistic Ideal for the betterment of the planet!

    Cleaner fuels..and new eco friendly directions, from the industrialized polluted nightmare they have going on now.

    Marijuana and Hemp could be the end of that, whilst fulfilling the Eden principle.

    New worlds to make..from square number one!

    “And God made the plants, and saw they were very good” when used the right way!

    Sir Les

  2. Joe and his six pack on

    Marijuana is a cancer cure and the government will get thousand of dollars from
    the pill company that bribe the politicians that will keep the cure from ever getting to the public. You have to ask your self why do governments are so afraid to let studies go on with THC the main ingredient which have shown to kill cancer cells while leaving good sell un harm no pill can do this but the government keeps pulling the plug on these studies When one side of there mouth they say its to protect the people. This is a crime in itself and one day the people of the world should unit and sue the government and prosecute them as crimes to humanity for suppressing the cure to cancer. Still do not believe me Google cancer a THC and you will see hundred of studies that have been stop because THC show to kill cancer they do not want this information out there for the people to know this because treating is more profitable than curing.The governments are the real criminals and it is time to put them in jail were they belong and keep a bed open for there friendly lobbyist corporations buddies who bribe them We need to follow sound science and jail the rest of those Fu##en ass hole who create more harm with the prohibition laws than the drug to them self’s

  3. Joe and his six pack on

    Marijuana is a cancer and the government will get thousand of dollars from
    the pill company that bribe the politicians that will keep the cure from ever getting to the public. You have to ask your self why do governments are so afraid to let studies go on with THC the main ingredient which have shown to kill cancer cells while leaving good sell un harm no pill can do this but the government keeps pulling the plug on these studies When one side of there mouth they say its to protect the people. This is a crime in itself and one day the people of the world should unit and sue the government and prosecute them as crimes to humanity for suppressing the cure to cancer. Still do not believe me Google cancer a THC and you will see hundred of studies that have been stop because THC show to kill cancer they do not want this information out there for the people to know this because treating is more profitable than curing.The governments are the real criminals and it is time to put them in jail were they belong and keep a bed open for there friendly lobbyist corporations buddies who bribe them We need to follow sound science and jail the rest of those Fu##en ass hole who create more harm with the prohibition laws than the drug to them self’s

  4. Anonymous on

    i think she should be tied up and locked in a room and forced to smoke one bowl of the worlds finest so she can see for herself that it will not make you have a breakdown or anything else negative. but then again why waste it on that bitch. send her ass to iroq.

  5. Anonymous on

    What can you say about someone like Jacqui Smith? Should she be shot on sight? Should she be stoned to death? Should she be banished from society? Well, she should at least lose her xxxxxxx job.

  6. skinny monkey on

    Primarily, it is laughable that society’s gatekeepers have taken a strong stance on another issue they know nothing about, the pro’s of legalisation far outweigh the reasons for prohibition. The worst thing is they were really sly about it, it’s not just about cannabis it is also an issue of backdoor legislation, and the criminalisation of innocent people. Interesting how we can see plant’s like deadly nightshade grow free next to the side of the road, should there not be some restriction on this?, also the worst thing that can be said is that it can lead to psychological problems, but next time you get any prescription drugs, look at the side effects because they all have the same and worse side effects. Anybody who would like to put their view accross on film please contact me as i am constructing a documentary to try and give a fair and balanced argument without such a demonised attitude towards smokers.
    Finally, i have met thousands of cannabis users, ranging from plumbers, to high court judges, to students, to civil servents, to teachers, to musicians artists and most ironically politicians.