Mexican Collapse? Drug Wars Worry Some Americans

A Mexican soldier stands on guard at a house where marijuana plants being grown were found in Tijuana, Mexico, Thursday, Jan. 15, 2009. Special forces soldiers found some 170 marijuana plants, in a room used as a greenhouse, and detained a suspect. (AP Photo/Guillermo Arias)A Mexican soldier stands on guard at a house where marijuana plants being grown were found in Tijuana, Mexico, Thursday, Jan. 15, 2009. Special forces soldiers found some 170 marijuana plants, in a room used as a greenhouse, and detained a suspect. (AP Photo/Guillermo Arias)MEXICO CITY – Indiscriminate kidnappings. Nearly daily beheadings. Gangs that mock and kill government agents. This isn’t Iraq or Pakistan. It’s Mexico, which the U.S. government and a growing number of experts say is becoming one of the world’s biggest security risks.

The prospect that America’s southern neighbor could melt into lawlessness provides an unexpected challenge to Barack Obama’s new government. In its latest report anticipating possible global security risks, the U.S. Joint Forces Command lumps Mexico and Pakistan together as being at risk of a “rapid and sudden collapse.”

“The Mexican possibility may seem less likely, but the government, its politicians, police and judicial infrastructure are all under sustained assault and pressure by criminal gangs and drug cartels,” the command said in the report published Nov. 25.

“How that internal conflict turns out over the next several years will have a major impact on the stability of the Mexican state.”

Retiring CIA chief Michael Hayden told reporters on Friday that that Mexico could rank alongside Iran as a challenge for Obama — perhaps a greater problem than Iraq.

The U.S. Justice Department said last month that Mexican gangs are the “biggest organized crime threat to the United States.” National security adviser Stephen Hadley said last week that the worsening violence threatens Mexico’s very democracy.

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff recently told The New York Times he ordered additional border security plans to be drawn up this summer as kidnappings and killings spilled into the U.S.

The alarm is spreading to the private sector as well. Mexico, Latin America’s second biggest economy and the United States’ third biggest oil supplier, is one of the top 10 global risks for 2009 identified by the Eurasia Group, a New York-based consulting firm.

Mexico is brushing aside the U.S. concerns, with Interior Secretary Fernando Gomez-Mont saying Wednesday: “It seems inappropriate to me that you would call Mexico a security risk. There are problems in Mexico that are being dealt with, that we can continue to deal with, and that’s what we are doing.”

Still, Obama faces a dramatic turnaround compared with the last time a new U.S. president moved into the White House. When George W. Bush was elected in 2000, the nation of 110 million had just chosen Vicente Fox as president in its fairest election ever, had ended 71 years of one-party rule and was looking forward to a stable, democratic future.

Fox signaled readiness to take on the drug cartels, but plunged them into a power vacuum by arresting their leaders, and gangs have been battling each other for territory ever since.

Felipe Calderon, who succeeded Fox in 2006, immediately sent troops across the country to try to regain control. But soldiers and police are outgunned and outnumbered, and cartels have responded with unprecedented violence.

Mob murders doubled from 2007, taking more than 5,300 lives last year. The border cities of Juarez and Tijuana wake up each morning to find streets littered with mutilated, often headless bodies. Some victims are dumped outside schools. Most are just wrapped in a cheap blanket and tossed into an empty lot.

Many bodies go unclaimed because relatives are too afraid to come forward. Most killings go unsolved.

Warring cartels still control vast sections of Mexico, despite Calderon’s two-year crackdown, and have spawned an all-pervasive culture of violence. No one is immune.

Businesses have closed because they can’t afford to pay monthly extortion fees to local thugs. The rich have fled to the U.S. to avoid one of the world’s highest kidnapping rates. Many won’t leave their homes at night.

The government has launched an intensive housecleaning effort after high-level security officials were accused of being on the take from the Sinaloa cartel. And several soldiers fighting the gangs were kidnapped, beheaded and dumped in southern Mexico last month with the warning: “For every one of mine that you kill, I will kill 10.”

But the U.S. government is extremely supportive of the Mexican president, recently handing over $400 million in anti-drug aid. Obama met briefly with Calderon in Washington last week and promised to fight the illegal flow south of U.S. weapons that arm the Mexican cartels.

While fewer Americans are willing to drive across the border for margaritas and handicrafts, visitors are still flocking to other parts of Mexico. And the economy seems harder hit by the global crisis than by the growing violence.

The grim assessments from north of the border got wide play in the Mexican media but came as no surprise to people here. Many said the solution lies in getting the U.S. to give more help and let in more migrant workers who might otherwise turn to the drug trade to make a living.

Otherwise the drug wars will spill ever more heavily into America, said Manuel Infante, an architect. “There is a wave of barbarity that is heading toward the U.S.,” he said. “We are an uncomfortable neighbor.”

– Article from the Associated Press on January 18, 2009.

Comments

4 Comments

  1. nick z on

    Interesting how the situation is downplayed by Fox. Interesting also how the US media enjoys milking the situation and possibly even exaggerating it. Most interesting is how the NSA fascist CIA Goon-master Hayden and DEA goons compare the situation to Iraq or Pakistan.

    Be warned people. The US federal fascist party has been looking for a good excuse for expanding its empire into Latin America and South America. The hyperbolic propaganda about Mexico’s drug war situation could be just the pretext for an invasion that they’re looking for. If Fox were really smart, he’d consider serious drug-law reforms, such as decrim and legalization of cannabis, asap, as one possible way to avoid such an invasion.

  2. Anonymous from West Virginia on

    All I Can Say is Refer/Marijuana laws Cause A lot more damage to people then smoking refer does, alone, and these Anti-Marijuana organizations Like the D.E.A. or whoever even confess proof of such when they make stupid comments to the public like smoking refer is a gateway/stepping stone to hard drugs. In other words they are flat out admitting that refer is not a hard drug by saying that.

  3. revolutionary on

    well put. If the us goverment endS it’s war on weed and regulates it.
    Thay would find that up to 50% of the druglords money supply would dry up and the crime that is created by the fight over this fast amount of money would drop like a rock.That money could work for us in the form of tax fund, and jobs.Keep in mined the fast amount of money that is generated for corperate america that loves to sell you the cure for your drug problem(billions a year).If you look at it from this piont of view you fined that people on both side of this war never want the war to end thay stand to lose to much.On the one side the drug king pin,and on the other corperate america both make billions a year because of the war on drugs.The war on drugs keeps the price of drugs high, making it a cash cow for the criminals of the world.On the side corperate america get to sell you a cure that fails 92% of the time this being rehab that comes with a caring price tag of about 1500 dallas a day at most places,and after paying these caring places all that money thay still only have an 8% success rate wich mean thay can sell you this curer over and over again works for them.This still does not cover all the other corperate interest that think an end to the war on pot would cost them big money.